After years of updating flood hazard data, North Carolina and the Federal Emergency Management Agency have been rolling out the latest Flood Insurance Rate Maps, or FIRMs, for communities along the coast – but some state and local officials are cautioning residents against relying too heavily on the new documents when assessing risk.
The recent release of new data marks the first time in roughly a decade that property owners may see their real estate move from one flood hazard zone to another as well as fluctuations in base flood elevations in at at-risk areas – two issues that have significant effects on flood insurance rates as well as building practices in coastal communities.
The latest batch of finalized maps, set to go into effect in June, includes seven central coastal counties of Dare, Hyde, Onslow, Craven, Beaufort, Pamlico and Pitt – communities that often find themselves in the potential path of hurricanes each year.
Other coastal counties, such as New Hanover, Currituck and Brunswick, saw their updated maps go into effect in 2018, while some communities, such as Carteret County, have appealed some portions of the revised maps, which has delayed their adoption.
Some communities, like Dare County, will see widespread changes in flood zone designations in June, with just over 40% of properties in that county being moved out of a Special Flood Hazard Area, or SPHA.
The updated maps, says Randy Mundt, N.C. Floodplain Mapping Program outreach coordinator, take into account several newer coastal models the state has been using to predict storm surge, nearshore wave action, how water behaves and how waves will act when they’re on normally dry ground that has been inundated because of the surge.
What the new FIRMs don’t factor in, he asserts, is flooding from rainfall or the impacts of climate change. The result has even left some community officials, like Hyde County Board of Commissioners Vice Chairman Tom Pahl, scratching their heads.
Evidence of a flooding trend
Pahl represents Ocracoke, which experienced disastrous flooding in September, when Hurricane Dorian inundated the small island with 7 feet of storm surge.
The evidence that flood elevations are increasing and at a rapid rate, Pahl asserts, is undeniable.
“That FEMA has elected to reduce flood elevation requirements in some cases comes as a bit of a shock to us, especially in light of Dorian,” he said, adding hadn’t seen flooding the likes of Dorian’s wrath since the 1944 hurricane.
“We certainly can’t deny that flood elevations are increasing,” Pahl said, noting that Hurricane Alex in 2004 set a new high water mark for the island since the 1944 storm.
Hurricane Matthew broke that record in 2016 by a foot and a half, and just three years later, Dorian significantly exceeded Matthew’s flooding.
“Technically, it’s only three data points but it would be foolish at this point not to recognize it as a trend,” he said.
Understanding the flood maps
Mundt acknowledged that the revised maps may be the subject of some confusion but added they are the result of 25 years or more of data that indicates that the surge, at the time of the study, was in fact less than what was predicted in the 1981 data that current maps are based on.
“Additionally, because we have better terrain data that they didn’t have in 1981, we’re able to model how the water that’s in the open ocean passes through the inlets and then goes into those receiving sounds.”
To the south of Cape Lookout, where those receiving sounds are smaller, water gets higher than the same amount of water that passes through larger sounds to the north, he explains.
“It’s a smaller reservoir; water gets higher,” Mundt said. “So that’s why north of Cape Lookout, you would see a reduction for the most part in the base flood elevation with the new model than you would see south of Cape Lookout.”
FIRMs identify zones that fall in the Special Flood Hazard Area:
- The AE zone, or the base flood plain where base flood elevations, or BFEs, are provided on maps, and there is a 1% annual chance of flooding.
- The AO zone, which represents river or stream hazard areas that have a 1% or greater annual chance of shallow flooding.
- The VE zone, which are areas subject to inundation by a 1% annual chance flood event with additional hazards due to storm-induced velocity wave action.
The X or shaded X zones are considered moderate-to-low-risk areas and are often referred to as the 500-year flood zone, where insurance isn’t federally required through the National Flood Insurance Program but is recommended.
Regardless of where a property lies in the flood zone, however, Mundt’s advice remains steadfast: “Get flood insurance.”
The maps, he asserts, “are just a statistical probability of flooding. Mother Nature does not read our flood map, and we know that recent flooding events, whether you are talking about Matthew or Florence, rainfall events have exceeded what are the 1% annual chance; and when we have more rain than what we’re predicting, you’re going to see flooding outside of where we map.”
Flood risk boundaries move in both directions
While Dare County experienced a large portion of homes being moved out of the SFHA, other counties like Onslow, saw the opposite.
Onslow County Land Use Administrator Angie Manning said her county is a seeing pretty good number of properties being labeled at an increased risk for flooding, moving from the AE to the VE zone, while some in the AE zone are seeing a lower BFE standard.
There were some areas of the county, like Topsail Beach, where a number of properties were moved out of the SFHA.
“But as we learned in Florence,” Manning cautioned, “floodwaters don’t know where lines on the map are, nor the base flood elevation. Structures flooded that weren’t in the (flood) zone.
She added, “Really everyone should get flood insurance … it’s just a smart thing to do.”
Craven County Planning Director Don Baumgardner said that while there are not tremendous changes in his community’s new flood map, some areas have been taken out of the flood zones that have had substantial flooding up and above the previously shown flood elevation.
“Yes, we are concerned about areas taken out – not just because we think might flood, but we’ve actually seen them flood,” Baumgardner said.
But Baumgardner acknowledged that there’s a larger issue at stake.
Recalling flooding from Hurricane Florence, the worst that many areas the state has seen since the 1950s, Baumgardner said a shift is needed to begin the process of not building in harm’s way.
“This is a bigger issue than one community and its maps,” he said. “If you’ve ever been flooded, you are either selling, moving to higher ground or elevating your house … we all know that history does repeat itself and can be exceeded.”
Community approaches allowed
Luckily, Mundt said, the National Flood Insurance Program and North Carolina state law allow communities to exercise higher regulatory standards than what the program’s minimum flood plain management standards are – and communities are doing just that.
“In most cases along the open coast, communities are taking that approach, recognizing that they’re in an area of higher risk … and they do apply higher regulatory standards for development,” he noted.
Counties like Dare, for instance, are considering amendments to their zoning ordinance to incorporate local elevation standards such as freeboard, a safety factor that is expressed in feet above the base flood elevation.
Enacting such standards not only protects properties, Mundt said, but also qualifies communities to participate in FEMA’s Community Rating System, a program that some 85 coastal communities take part in that rewards discounts on insurance premiums to its citizens.
Better flood risk assessment tools planned
In addition, FEMA is looking at more accurately assessing risk in the future with what is called Risk Rating 2.0.
Expected to launch in October 2021, it will rate flood insurance using factors that go further than just what flood zone a property falls in. Rather, the rating system will consider details such as how close a property is to a Special Flood Hazard Area and what elevation the lowest floor relative to the base flood elevation.
But as for Mundt, his primary message is for property owners to have flood insurance. To drive home his point, he noted that 85% of the claims made with 1999’s Hurricane Floyd flood damage came from outside the Special Flood Hazard Area.
He noted that those who are 40 or 50 years old have seen increased storm events and increased flooding beyond what they remember as children.
“I think the important point to emphasize is the mapping that we’re doing right now, and FEMA is doing across the United States, is only a snapshot in time, he said.
“So people need to recognize that if they think there’s anything to sea level rise, anything to climate change, they need to be thinking this really kind of under-represents what things will look like 20 years 30 years down the road and what the flood risk is going to be.”
You can strengthen independent, in-depth and investigative news for all of North Carolina
Carolina Public Press is transforming from a regionally focused nonprofit news organization to the go-to independent, in-depth and investigative news arm for North Carolina. You are critical to this transformation — and the future of investigative and public interest reporting for all North Carolinians.
Unlike many others, we aren’t owned by umbrella organizations or corporations. And we haven’t put up a paywall — we believe that fact-based, context-rich watchdog journalism is a vital public service. But we need your help. Carolina Public Press’ in-depth, investigative and public interest journalism takes a lot of money, persistence and hard work to produce. We are here because we believe in and are dedicated to the future of North Carolina.
So, if you value independent, in-depth and investigative reporting in the public interest for North Carolina, please take a moment to make a tax-deductible contribution. It only takes a minute and makes a huge difference. Thank you!